Home / About us / Our professionals / Timothy Norris /

Norwegian Supreme Court Decision about the Right to One's Own Picture
05. January 10
In a recent decision by the Norwegian Supreme Court, the snowboarder Andy Finch is granted compensation for unlawful use of a photograph picturing him.
In a judgment from the Norwegian Supreme Court of December 10, it was decided that it is not always sufficient to make an agreement with the copyright holder of a photography in order to use the photo. In certain cases is it also necessary to obtain consent from the person depicted prior to using the photography for commercial purposes.
 
In the present case, the Norwegian company The Arctic Challenge (TAC) and the snowboarder Andy Finch raised a law suit against Tromsø 2018 AS. The dispute started after Tromsø 2018 used a picture of Finch in performance over mountains, ocean and sky in the Norwegian city Tromsø. The picture was used in marketing material for promoting the city Tromsø as a candidate for arranging the Olympic Winter Games in 2018.
 
The photography was taken by a Norwegian photographer under a snowboard event in Tromsø in 2004. Tromsø 2018 AS had bought the photo from this photographer and they argued that they were entitled to use the photo. Finch was never asked for permission prior to the use of the photo.
 
Finch/TAC lost the law suit totally both at the District Court and the Appeal Court. The Supreme Court reached nevertheless a different conclusion.
 
The legal challenge in this case was that as an American citizen Andy Finch was not protected by the Norwegian Copyright Act.  According to article 45c in this act a photography with a picture of a person may not be used in public without the persons permission. According to article 58 the person must be domiciled in Norway at that time to be protected by the law.
 
Contrary to the previous court instances the Supreme Court reached the conclusion that the right to one's own picture is so strongly founded in personal security rights that an equal right as established in the Norwegian Copyright Act also exists for foreigners such as Finch.
 
The Supreme Court concluded that  Tromsø 2018 AS had to pay a compensation of NOK 80.000, for the unlawful use of this picture. Additionally, Finch and TAC were awarded the costs for all three Court instances.
 
The judgment was passed under dissenting votes 4-1.
 
The decision may be found at Lovdata.
 

Back to newsarchive
  Gå til norske sider Norske sider 
News from Acapo
03 May 2013
The New Norwegian Board of Appeal for Industrial Property Rights
Until 1.st April this year all decisions from the Norwegian Industrial Property Office (NIPO) could be appealed to the appeal institute “The Second Instance”. From this date the institute was replaced by the new appeal institute “The Norwegian Board of Appeal for Industrial Property Rights” (BoA). The changes are regulated by the amended Act of 22.nd June 2012, no. 58 regulating the organization of the Norwegian Industrial Property Office.
Read more

15 January 2013
New EU patent and Court
The EU parliament has passed the establishment of a unitary EU patent, and a court for enforcement thereof. Thus, one will be able to apply for an EU patent and enforce it in the whole of Europe through a single, common judiciary system, without the need for acting through the national courts in each member state. As an EPC member but not EU member Norway is excluded, so EPC applications will still be validated in Norway, and enforced through national Norwegian patent court cases.
Read more

12 October 2012
We congratulate Katja Reitan as European patent Attorney
Katja Reitan has just passed the European Qualifying Examination (EQE) and thus the right to the title European Patent Attorney. She is thereby qualified to represent clients before the European Patent Office (EPO) as a professional representative.
Read more

Go to newsarchive
Acapo AS - P.O.Box 1880 Nordnes - N-5817 BERGEN - Phone: +47 55 21 40 80 - Fax: +47 55 21 40 81 - mail@acapo.no Design by Maritime ColoursPublish Online™